Services · Consulting & buying guides
How to Buy Accessibility Remediation and Prove It Landed
For the owner holding a findings list and looking for somebody to work it. That somebody is not us. What follows is the next best thing we can hand you: how the job is shaped, what a real quote looks like, and who should check the result.
What Remediation Actually Involves
We do not sell repair work. Not as an add-on, not after the report, not at any price, so if you came here for a company to hand the list to, the honest answer is that you are in the wrong shop. Stay anyway, because what we know about remediation we know from the far end of it, which is opening the code afterwards and finding out whether it worked.
Start with what the word actually covers, because it is three jobs with three different shapes and one of them never ends. Template work means the components, the theme and the layouts, and it is finite. Forty findings across forty pages are very often one component rendered forty times, so one file changed once collapses the list. Content work means the alt text, the headings and the link text on pages your people are still writing, so it finishes when publishing does. Document work means the PDFs, and it is routinely the most expensive of the three, because documents inherit nothing from each other and every file is its own job.
That split is also how a quote should be written. Ask for a price per template and per document rather than one number for the site. A supplier who can quote that way has looked at your pages. A supplier who insists on a single figure for everything is either carrying a risk premium or has not opened them yet, and both of those come out of your budget.
Then four questions, and the answers tell you more than the price does. Is this priced per template or per page, because per page on a templated site means somebody is padding or has not looked? Are the documents in it, and how many, because if the number is missing the documents are out whatever the covering email says? Who owns the code afterwards, and what still works if you stop paying, because a fix that lives inside a vendor's script leaves when the invoice does? And who verifies the result, because if it is the same people who made the fixes, nobody has checked anything.
That last question is why this page exists rather than a price list. A firm that finds the defects, repairs them, then signs off its own repair has quietly removed the only independent step in the chain. We stayed out of the repair business so our retest means something to somebody outside your company. It costs us the part of this trade where the real money is, and it is the reason the audit price can be published before anybody opens your site.
What Our Audit Hands the People Who Do the Work
- Name the failing element, the criterion it breaks, and the remedy, on every finding
- Group findings by the template or component that produces them, so a quote can be priced per template
- Mark which findings belong to a vendor you do not control, and write the ticket they will need
- Rank the list by user impact, so the first sprint starts where users hurt most
- Retest the finished work with all three passes, which we can do because we did not do the work
What You Get
A report your developer can work straight from. Every finding carries the screenshot, the element, the criterion and the remedy, plus a link into the 432 free fix guides. Writing the fix is our job and it always has been, because a finding somebody has to come back and ask about has not been written properly. Making the fix is somebody else's.
You can hand that report to anyone. Your own developer, your agency, a document vendor, a specialist remediation firm. Nothing in it is written to be readable only by us, there is no portal, and you never have to speak to us again for it to be worth what you paid.
Then the piece the people who did the repair cannot give you. The verification re-audit runs the same three passes over the same pages and marks every finding fixed, regressed, or remaining, with fresh dated evidence. If a regulator, a buyer or a court reads that verdict, the fact that we never touched your code is what makes it worth reading.
The Honest Limit
One honest limit, and it is about what this page can do for you. We can tell you how the job is shaped and what a fair quote looks like. We cannot tell you who to hire, because we keep no partner list, take no referral fee, and run no vetted directory, and quietly earning a cut is exactly the arrangement the rest of this page argues against. Ask the four questions, insist on the per-template price, and get somebody with no stake in the work to check it afterwards.
What It Costs
There is nothing to quote you here, because the repair is not ours to sell. What we sell is the audit that makes it buyable, flat-rate at $499 Rapid for up to 10 pages in 5 business days, or $1,499 Standard for up to 25 pages in 10 business days. The verification re-audit is half price within 3 months, and it does not matter to us who did the fixing. For the other half of your budget, the one we cannot quote, our guide to what remediation costs is linked below and it is there so you can work out your own number before you talk to a single supplier.
Worth Reading Next
Related on this site
Guides, checklists, tools, and terms that go with this service.
More in Consulting & buying guides
- ADA compliance servicesADA Compliance Services That Find It, Then Prove It Gone
- Website accessibility servicesWebsite Accessibility Services, One Engine and Every Door
- Accessibility consultingAccessibility Consulting That Gives Straight Answers in Writing
- Buying document remediationPDF and Document Remediation, Scoped Before You Pay for It