Services · Formal deliverables

An Executive Scorecard Translates the Audit for the Board

For the leader who has to explain accessibility to a board, a buyer, or a budget owner, and gets one page and five minutes to do it.

What We Keep Finding

Your audit report is written for the people who'll fix things, and it should be. Your board deck is a different animal. Put a findings table in front of a budget owner and you get polite nodding, a parked decision, and no budget. Nobody in that room is going to read a WCAG criterion, and honestly, that is fine. It is not their job.

The scorecard translates. One page. A score they can repeat without looking down. The top risks in language a board already speaks, meaning which customer journeys are blocked and which markets that exposes you in. And a plan laid out by quarter with effort attached. That quarterly plan is the board's version of the sprint-by-sprint sequence your engineers get in the remediation roadmap, cut to the level where the decision actually gets made. The whole thing is built to be forwarded, because it will be.

One thing about that score, said here rather than in a footnote. It is ours. WCAG defines no score and grades no site out of a hundred. Conformance in the standard is a pass or a fail against each rule, one web page at a time. Which is why a number is the only form a board meeting can use, and also the form that travels furthest from what was measured. Drop it into a supplier questionnaire or a press release and it starts claiming something the standard does not recognize. So we print that sentence on the scorecard itself, next to the number, where the person forwarding it will see it.

What We Check

Boil the audit down to one score a non-specialist can repeat in a meeting
Print, next to the score, that the score is ours and is not a conformance level
Name the top risks the way a board names them, so blocked journeys and exposed markets
Lay out the plan by quarter, with effort and owners sketched in
Cut every technical detail that does not change a decision
Fit it on one page, because a second page is where board attention goes to die

What You Get

Every service on this site runs the same three-pass engine: an automated scan, an expert review of all 55 WCAG 2.2 A and AA rules, and a hands-on session with a professional blind screen-reader user. You get one report with every finding screenshotted, ranked by user impact, and linked to its fix. Your team fixes, we verify: the re-audit is half price within 3 months.

The format is not a mystery either. Read the sample report before you spend anything.

The Honest Limit

One honest limit. A scorecard summarizes evidence and cannot create any, so it is priced per document on top of the audit that gathers it, and it can only score the pages that audit covered. If somebody in the room asks whether the whole site is compliant, the honest answer is no. Nobody can tell you that from a sample, and it is better heard from your own scorecard than from the other side's lawyer. Email us and a number comes back, not a sales call.

What It Costs

Rapid Audit: $499, up to 10 pages you pick, report in 5 business days. Standard Audit: $1,499, up to 25 pages in 10 business days. Flat rates, no discovery calls, and a real blind screen-reader user on every engagement. Pick your pages. We bring the humans.

Order your audit Run the free scan first

Worth Reading Next

Related on this site

Guides, checklists, tools, and terms that go with this service.