Services · Testing types
Your Site, Tried by Someone Who Cannot See It
For the team that wants its site tried by the people the rules exist for, rather than simulated by a sighted developer with the monitor turned off.
What We Keep Finding
There is a version of this that is theater. A sighted tester shuts their eyes, pokes at a page with a screen reader for ten minutes, and writes down "usable". That is not what this is. Our testers are blind professionals who have run a screen reader every working day for years. They do not approximate the experience. It is their Tuesday.
Our screen reader testing page covers the tool, so what gets announced and where the markup lies. This page is about the person. A practiced blind user moves differently from any simulation. They skim by pulling up the heading list, jump by landmarks, and size up a site in the first half-minute the way a sighted visitor judges a design. Then they work your real journeys start to finish and say out loud exactly where the path breaks, which is a different sentence from "criterion 2.4.3 fails" and a more useful one to hand a developer.
It is worth knowing that the standard agrees with the premise rather than merely permitting it. WCAG's own introduction says that content conforming at the very highest level will still not be accessible to people with every type, degree and combination of disability. So a clean rule-by-rule pass is the floor of this work, and a person finishing the task is the thing you actually wanted.
What We Check
- Work your key journeys end to end, so find, decide, buy, and get help
- Narrate the session as it happens, recorded as it was said
- Flag where a practiced user gets lost, not only where a rule breaks
- Try the shortcuts daily users lean on, so headings, landmarks, link lists
- Rank barriers by how badly they broke the journey, blockers first
What You Get
Every service on this site runs the same three-pass engine: an automated scan, an expert review of all 55 WCAG 2.2 A and AA rules, and a hands-on session with a professional blind screen-reader user. You get one report with every finding screenshotted, ranked by user impact, and linked to its fix. Your team fixes, we verify: the re-audit is half price within 3 months.
The format is not a mystery either. Read the sample report before you spend anything.
The Honest Limit
One honest limit. One tester cannot stand in for every user with every disability, and this pass goes deep on the screen-reader experience rather than wide across all of them. What covers the rest is the expert review, which works all 55 Level A and AA rules by hand and is where the low-vision, motor and cognitive criteria get answered. The report says which pass found what, so you can see the difference rather than take our word for it. And we run one screen reader and browser pairing per audit, named in the report. Tell us at scoping which one matches your audience.
What It Costs
Rapid Audit: $499, up to 10 pages you pick, report in 5 business days. Standard Audit: $1,499, up to 25 pages in 10 business days. Flat rates, no discovery calls, and a real blind screen-reader user on every engagement. Pick your pages. We bring the humans.
Worth Reading Next
Related on this site
Guides, checklists, tools, and terms that go with this service.