ACT Rule 1a02b0 · proposed
Audio and visuals of video element have transcript
A transcript for a video has to carry both halves, what is said and what is shown. This rule checks that a video element on the page has a transcript covering the dialogue and the visual information together.
A tool can find the places this applies and then hand you the decision. The rule is proposed, so it has not yet been implemented in full by a tool and reviewed by a W3C working group, and the wording can still change.
What passing this rule proves
When this rule fails, 1.2.8 Media Alternative (Prerecorded) is not satisfied, and that half is certain. When it passes, W3C's own outcome mapping says the criterion still needs further testing. So a green result here is evidence that one specific thing is not broken, and it is the answer W3C gives on 59 of its 87 live rules.
Whether a transcript is complete is a judgment about content, so the rule finds transcripts rather than grading them. Somebody has to read it beside the video. Check that a person who cannot see the screen, and a person who cannot hear it, both end up with the same story.
The criteria this rule is a test for
These are the criteria the rule names as its own conformance requirement. Each one is a far bigger question than this rule asks, and our page for it sets out what the whole criterion covers.
- 1.2.8 Media Alternative (Prerecorded) Level AAA
Criteria that are related but not tested here
W3C calls these secondary requirements. The rule correlates with them and was not designed to test them, so each one is either stricter than the rule or can be satisfied in ways the rule never looks at.
The composite rule this one feeds
This is an atomic input rule, which is why it names no criterion of its own. W3C combines its outcome with the other inputs below, and it is the composite that maps to WCAG. A report that cites this rule id alone has told you about one ingredient, not about the dish.
- Video element visual content has accessible alternative A tool finds candidates, you decide
The normative rule text lives at W3C
What the rule applies to, and exactly what it expects, is published by W3C and can change. We link to it rather than restate it, so nothing here can quietly fall out of date against the source. Read rule 1a02b0 at W3C.
Transcripts, captions and audio description are not the same thing
Which alternative a piece of media needs depends on what is in it. Video with sound needs captions so a deaf viewer gets the dialogue. It also needs audio description so a blind viewer gets what is only shown on screen.
Audio on its own needs a transcript. Video with no sound needs either a transcript or an audio track. Getting one of these right does not cover the others. Several rules look at the same file and ask different questions about what it has to be.
The usual mistake is a transcript posted under a video and treated as finished. It helps, but it is not a caption. It does not meet the criterion that asks for captions.
Fixes that satisfy it
If this rule fails on your site, these are the techniques that put it right.
All 87 ACT rules are grouped by the criteria they test, and 24 of them decide nothing about WCAG on their own. Run a free scan to see which of these your own pages trip.